Knowledge Partners
Universities, research institutes and technology centres advancing decision assurance, explainability and evidence-based authority.
Challenge the research →AI agents are becoming capable of acting, while enterprises still rely on human verification for consequential decisions. Google, Microsoft, Oracle and other enterprise platforms can govern agents, access, security and operations. LedgerPilot addresses the next question: is this specific business decision sufficiently supported and safe to proceed? It independently evaluates the decision, preserves the evidence in a portable Decision Assurance Record and determines the appropriate authority outcome.
LedgerPilot is being shaped as a platform-independent application through scientific challenge, focused co-design, enterprise validation and ecosystem integration.
Universities, research institutes and technology centres advancing decision assurance, explainability and evidence-based authority.
Challenge the research →Finance teams ready to co-design, validate and shape the first sellable D1 product in real operating conditions.
Co-design D1 →CFOs, CIOs and COOs exploring how AI authority can be introduced without weakening control or accountability.
Explore the business case →Microsoft partners, ISVs and integrators adding independent Decision Assurance to Business Central—and later to other enterprise and agent platforms.
Explore partnership →A 2026 global survey of 900 CEOs by Dataiku and The Harris Poll shows the tension now shaping enterprise AI: leaders are using AI in decision-making, but human verification, explainability and legal accountability remain central. LedgerPilot is designed for that gap — at the level of the individual business decision.
for business-critical AI decisions. Capability is advancing, but enterprises are not yet ready to grant unconditional autonomy.
at least occasionally. Trust is conditional: consequential decisions need evidence, explanation and a defensible basis.
as agents take on more responsibility. The question is no longer only what an agent can do, but what the enterprise can responsibly allow it to do.
Source: Dataiku / The Harris Poll, Global AI Confessions Report: CEO Edition 2026. Survey conducted February–March 2026 among 900 CEOs of companies with annual revenue of at least US$500 million or regional equivalent. Statistics are paraphrased from the published survey findings.
LedgerPilot independently evaluates evidence, provenance, decision quality, policy compliance, risk and explainability before the decision may proceed.
The agent is evaluated by decision class, operating context, observed outcomes, exceptions and human interventions—not by generic capability claims.
Assurance evidence and the Delegation of Authority envelope determine whether the agent may advise, propose, decide or execute this specific decision.
Every AA Certificate is scoped, monitored and reversible, with human escalation, override and revocation embedded in the operating model.
Generic governance platforms manage the environment around AI: agents, identity, access, security, orchestration and monitoring. LedgerPilot does not duplicate those capabilities. It integrates with them and independently evaluates the individual business decision—separating the decision-maker from the decision-assurer and keeping the assurance result portable across platforms.
Every decision starts untrusted. LedgerPilot defines the decision boundary, captures the relevant evidence and verifies its source, completeness, context and integrity before independent assurance begins.
The AA result is not a generic platform safety label or a blanket promise of zero risk. It is decision-specific evidence that the applicable assurance and authority conditions were met within an explicit, monitored and reversible scope.
Confirm the decision source, agent identity, context, provenance and completeness of the evidence before any trust is granted.
Use EDA to evaluate decision quality, policy compliance, confidence, risk, provenance and explainability.
Measure identity, performance and reliability by decision class using accuracy, consistency, exceptions, interventions and realised outcomes.
Use AGA to confirm that the agent holds the required Delegation of Authority for this decision, context and risk level.
Certify the decision as Assured and Authorised only when the applicable evidence, policy, risk and authority conditions are met.
Execute within guardrails, record the outcome and use new evidence to maintain, expand, reduce or revoke authority.
LedgerPilot begins with Supplier Invoice Posting Eligibility in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. D1 independently evaluates whether a proposed posting decision is sufficiently supported, assigns an assurance grade and produces an auditable Decision Assurance Record. It starts read-only and advisory-first, with humans accountable. Business Central is the first evidence environment—not the boundary of the product.
100% human decisions is a valid—and valuable—starting point.
Make exceptions, approvals, posting choices and human interventions visible without changing who decides.
Reconstruct historical decisions, then score live cases in parallel to operations—with no autonomous execution.
Introduce advice first, then grant narrow decision authority only to proven decision classes within explicit limits.
Establish the human decision baseline, formalise decision classes and calibrate the first trustworthiness measures.
Evaluate live decisions and agent performance in shadow mode while all formal authority remains with humans.
Agents recommend actions; LedgerPilot values their decisions and performance while accountable humans retain the DoA.
AGA transfers narrow DoA for proven decision classes within explicit limits, continuous monitoring and immediate revocation controls.
Sustained performance supports broader authority, while continuous assurance can maintain, reduce or revoke it as conditions change.
LedgerPilot is being shaped as an ambitious research-driven Decision Assurance application in Flanders. It starts from a Zero Trust thesis, a platform-independent product boundary and a practical first proving ground—but its decisive questions cannot be resolved through conventional software development alone. The next step is to bring together the scientific, architectural and industrial capabilities required to formalise the assurance science, engineer the authority controls and validate decision-level assurance in enterprise reality.